Print
 

  MIG Update – October 28, 2024



IE Fails to Explain Lack of Diagnosis

This week, a MIG escape, where the Tribunal considered the psychological validity testing relied upon by both parties and the interpretation of the results or the lack thereof. Of note, the Applicant’s report was submitted following the Respondent’s report and although not altogether clear it appears that the Respondent did not put the Applicant’s report back to their IE assessor for further comment.



Virtual Training – Fall Session!

Secure your seat for inHEALTH’s 2024 Fall Virtual Training session!

  • BI Fundamentals: November 4th – 8th, 2024

*Eligible Participants receive 9 Substantive – CPD hours upon course completion

Course details & register here +



Factor: Psychological Validity Testing

In Pavliashvili v. Economical Insurance Company (22-008220) Nino Pavliashvili was involved in a motor vehicle accident on March 3, 2020, and sought entitlement to NEBs from March 14, 2021, to March 3, 2022; three OCF-18s for physiotherapy; and psychological, chronic pain, orthopaedic, neurological, and neurological assessments. She claimed that she should not be held within the MIG as she has documented pre-existing injuries, chronic pain, and a psychological condition.

What follows is the review of the parties position and outcome with respect to the psychological injury.

Pavliashvili relied on the March 2021 report prepared by registered psychotherapist Dr. Vintu, under the supervision of psychologist Dr. Waxer. She was diagnosed with Persistent Somatic Symptom Disorder with Predominant Pain: Severe, Chronic Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood, and Specific Phobia: Situational Type: Vehicular. She further relied on a March 2020 note from family physician, Dr. Milad where she reported insomnia and feeling stressed since the accident. As well as, the March 2020 OCF-3 where Dr. Nikols, chiropractor noted she was experiencing a loss of appetite, signs and symptoms of an emotional state, nervousness, and sleep disorder, and recommended a psychological assessment. Further the March 2020 record from 101 Physio that noted she reported having a loss of appetite, fear in a vehicle, and loss of sleep.

Economical disagreed, relying on the January 2021 IE report of psychologist, Dr. Mandel who found that there was “a lack of consistent objective information present that would support poor prognosis, DSM V diagnosis and/or suggest that she suffered clinically significant symptoms that would indicate a substantial psychological impairment or disability” as a result of the accident. Further submitting that Dr. Mandel’s report should be preferred over Dr. Vintu’s, as it screened for validity concerns, included a review of medical documentation, and was more consistent with the medical records.

Moreover, that Dr. Vintu’s diagnosis of “persistent somatic symptom disorder with predominant pain” is a catch-all for any set of symptoms that otherwise do not meet the full criteria for any disorders.” It argues that the DSM-V specifically states that it is not supposed to be used unless there are “decidedly unusual situations where there is insufficient information to make a more specific diagnosis.” Dr. Vintu did not explain any “decided unusual situations”.




The Tribunal found:

    • “Dr. Vintu noted Pavliashvili had a moderate level of depression on the Beck Depression Inventory, a moderate level of anxiety on the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and a diagnosis of “Dysfunctional” on the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), which indicated that she experienced high pain impact, affective distress, and severe functional limitations. Dr. Vintu also administered the Symptom-Checklist-90-revised questionnaire, and found that the applicant’s symptoms revealed a pattern and magnitude in the clinical range.”
    • “Dr. Mandel administered the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), MPI, and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptoms (SIMS). On the PAI, her clinical profile revealed “specific fears of anxiety surrounding some situations, likely experienced past trauma, discomforting level of anxiety and tension, an unusual degree of concern regarding physical function and health, and a significant depressive experience.” On the MPI, her results were generally in the average range, however it was significantly below average with respect to “General Activity…”
    • They both administered the MPI test and the results were similar, however, unlike Dr. Vintu, Dr. Mandel did not provide a diagnosis or any explanation of what the results meant.
    • “I also note that Dr. Mandel did not provide any reasons for his belief that the applicant’s condition did not merit a DSM-V diagnosis, despite the symptoms she reported to him. In fact, the applicant’s depression and anxiety appear to be in line with the symptoms Dr. Mandel described, and yet Dr. Mandel did not explain why he was unable to make a diagnosis. I prefer Dr. Vintu’s report as it was more detailed with respect to explaining her findings.”
    • The records relied upon by Pavliashvili documented her complaints of insomnia and stress since the accident, her loss of appetite, signs and symptoms of an emotional state, nervousness, and sleep disorder and fear in a vehicle. Dr. Mandel described psychological symptoms in his report as well.


If you Have Read This Far…

Our MIG Monday series discusses the multitude of factors to consider when evaluating a risk position on MIG cases. The Tribunal has ruled on the MIG in 24% of the decisions so far. Each case is nuanced, but with similar factors.

Inform your position & present persuasive arguments. Include an Outcome Analysis Report (OAR) in your case evaluation complete with For/Against cases. Need an OAR?

 

Archive of LAT Updates

November 25, 2024: Pre-Screen Not Psychological Diagnosis

MIG

November 20, 2024: IE Not Reasonable or Necessary – No to CAT & IRB

CAT, IRB, Procedure

November 18, 2024: No Evidence Pre-Existing Conditions Prevent MMR

MIG

November 13, 2024: Applicant’s Explanation for Delayed Application Found Reasonable

Procedure

November 11, 2024: GP Concussion Diagnosis Accepted as Legitimate

MIG

November 6, 2024: Court Remits “Unsafe” Decision Back for Rehearing

CAT

November 4, 2024: Submissions Do Not = Evidence

MIG

October 30, 2024: Court Remits “Unsafe” Decision Back for Rehearing

CAT, Divisional Court

October 28, 2024: IE Fails to Explain Lack of Diagnosis

MIG

October 23, 2024: Loose Lid Unexpected "Accident"

Definition Accident

October 21, 2024: Dental Work Required Not Caused by MVA

MIG

October 7, 2024: Continuity of Complaints Confirm Chronic Pain

MIG

October 2, 2024: All Items in Dispute Deemed Incurred

Treatment Plans

September 30, 2024: Ignoring Medical Evidence Proves Award Worthy

MIG

September 25, 2024: Credibility Issues Abound with IE Assessor

IE

September 23, 2024: Reliance on Symptom Magnification Test Proves Fatal

MIG

September 16, 2024: Self Reporting Accepted for Psych MIG Escape

MIG

September 9, 2024: Diagnosis Alone Falls Short in Chronic Pain Case

MIG

September 4, 2024: CAT Finding Upheld on Reconsideration

CAT, Reconsiderations

August 28, 2024: Staged MVA Results in $93K Repayment Order

Definition Accident, Evidence

August 26, 2024: What Exactly Constitutes “Compelling” Evidence?

MIG

August 21, 2024: Extreme Impairment Confirmed in CAT Decision

CAT

August 19, 2024: Post Concussive Syndrome Diagnosed in Telephone Interview

MIG

August 14, 2024: Reconsideration Varies Decision Regarding “Accident”

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

August 12, 2024: Adverse Inference Considered in MIG Determination

MIG

August 7, 2024: Re-Training Not A Viable Option - Post 104 IRB Confirmed

IRB

July 31, 2024: Applicants Allowed to Proceed to Hearing Despite Alleged Non – Compliance

Insurer’s Examinations, Procedure

July 29, 2024: No Specific Reference to Evidence Precludes MIG Escape

MIG

July 24, 2024: When is a Spouse Not a “Spouse”?

Death Benefit

July 22, 2024: No Evidence Tendered to Rebut Concussion Diagnosis

MIG

July 17, 2024: 196K Grievance Award Factored into IRB Calculation

IRB

July 15, 2024: Chronic Pain Diagnosis Does Not Warrant MIG Escape

MIG

July 10, 2024: Court Allows Applicant to Submit Judicial Review After the Fact

Divisional Court

July 8, 2024: MIG Escape Despite Unrelated Psych Issues

MIG

July 3, 2024:Application Premature On Benefits Claimed in Excess of Limits

Award, CAT, Jurisdiction

June 26, 2024: Multiple Wilful Misrepresentations Claimed but Only One Established

IRB

June 24, 2024: Chronic Pain Diagnosis 4 Years Later Uncontroverted

MIG

June 19, 2024: Court Sets Aside Tribunal Decision and Makes Decision that Ought to Have Been Made

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

June 17, 2024: Cause of ‘Remote’ Finger Fracture Questioned

MIG

June 10, 2024: Reliability on IE Opinions Challenged

MIG

June 5, 2024: IE 'Highly Intrusive' - Not Acceptable Reason For Failure To Attend

Insurer's Examinations

June 3, 2024: MVA Necessary Cause of Subluxation of Shoulder Joint

MIG

May 29, 2024: Practicing Lawyer Seeks CAT Determination

CAT

May 27, 2024: Differing Opinions on Right Knee Injury Causation

MIG

May 22, 2024: Four Marked Impairments CAT and Post 104 IRB Confirmed

CAT, IRB

May 15, 2024: Court Confirms Three Breaches of Procedural Fairness by Tribunal

Div Court

May 13, 2024: Little Weight Given to Illegible Doctor's Notes

MIG

May 8, 2024: Reasonable Perception of Bias Involving Former Adjudicator Requires Rehearing

Reconsideration

May 6, 2024: Potential Causation Does Not Support MIG Escape

MIG

May 1, 2024: Tribunal Varies Three Decisions on Reconsideration

Reconsideration, Treatment Plans

April 29, 2024: Credibility of Assessment Favored Over Psych Validity Testing

MIG

April 24, 2024: Wilful Misrepresentation Abounds on IRB Repayments

IRB

April 22, 2024: Records Alone Do Not Warrant MIG Removal on Pre-Existing

MIG

April 15, 2024: Demands of Child-birth Pre-Existing Condition?

MIG

April 10, 2024: Court Upholds Tribunal Decision That a MIG Removal is a Complete MIG Removal

Divisional Court, MIG

April 8, 2024: Psychiatric Diagnosis Prevails over Psychological Opinion

MIG

April 3, 2024: Court Sends Matter Back to Tribunal Concerning “Accident”

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

April 1, 2024: Ortho Opinion Prevails on Origins of a Fracture

MIG

March 27, 2024: Supreme Court Takes Issue with Tribunal, Divisional Court & Court of Appeal

Limitation Period, Reconsideration, Supreme Court

March 25, 2024: Expert’s Conclusory Statement Insufficient on Pre-existing Condition

MIG

March 20, 2024: Non-Compliance by Both Parties Impacts IRB and Medical Claims

IRB

March 18, 2024: No Weight Afforded to Handwritten Illegible CNR’s

MIG

March 13, 2024: Denials Deficient and Pain Relief Validates Treatment Plans

Treatment Plans

March 11, 2024: “Radicular Irritation” & MRI Findings Not MVA Related

MIG

March 6, 2024: Tribunal Upholds Decision Excluding Improperly Secured IEs From the Evidence

Evidence, IE, Reconsideration

March 4, 2024: Concussion and Chronic Pain Diagnoses Require Expertise

MIG