Print
 

  MIG Update – January 15, 2024



Chronic Pain Diagnosis Contradicted by Self-Reports

This week, in contrast to last week’s featured, MIG Escape case, the Tribunal considered the veracity of the applicant’s chronic pain diagnosis, once again in absence of a competing medical opinion to reach their conclusion of a MIG hold. What did the Tribunal identify as the shortfall in the applicant’s evidence to make their determination?



Winter Virtual Training!

Secure your seat for inHEALTH’s 2024 Winter Virtual Training Sessions! 

  • BI Fundamentals: January 29th – February 2nd, 2024
  • SABS Expedited: February 26th – March 1st, 2024

*Eligible Participants receive 9 Substantive – CPD hours upon course completion

Course details & register here +



Factor: Chronic Pain Diagnosis Contradicted by Self-Reports

In Wahedi v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company (21-009228), Kochi Wahedi was involved in a motor vehicle accident on October 24, 2019 and claimed entitlement to a Treatment Plan for physiotherapy. She claimed that she should be removed from the MIG due to chronic pain.

Wahedi relied on a chronic pain assessment by Dr. Wilderman dated January 2023 which diagnosed her with chronic pain syndrome, bilateral sacroiliac joint dysfunction and adjustment disorder. As well as the CNRs from her family doctor Dr. Hamami and physiotherapy treatment clinic records demonstrated her ongoing pain complaints. She submitted that the Tribunal must accept Dr. Wilderman’s report because the Respondent did not schedule an IE to assess her.

Wawanesa disputed that Wahedi developed accident-related chronic pain, submitting that the family doctors’ CNR’s do not reference Wahedi making any pain complaints until October 2021 nor did she report any psychological symptoms. Further, Dr. Wilderman’s diagnosis of chronic pain should be given limited weight as it was largely based on Wahedi’s self-report and not consistent with the medical records.





The Tribunal found:

  • There were limited reports of ongoing pain to the family doctors. Despite regular attendances no mention of pain symptoms until December 2022. These limited reports were not compelling evidence of severe, chronic pain. Likewise, the list of medications were for unrelated conditions.
  • The report of ongoing pain found in the physiotherapy records varied during the course of treatment and by January 2020 she only complained of tension in her back.
  • “Further, a chronic pain diagnosis or ongoing pain by itself does not remove the applicant from the MIG. It must be accompanied by some functional impairment, 16-000438 v The Personal Insurance Company. For chronic pain to be more than sequelae from soft tissue injuries, it must be: (1) continuous, or chronic pain syndrome; and (2) it must be of a severity that it causes suffering and distress accompanied by functional impairment or disability. A diagnosis of chronic pain without any discussion of the level of pain, its effect on the person’s function, or whether the pain is bearable without treatment will not meet the applicant’s burden to show that chronic pain is more than mere sequelae. Unless the applicant provides evidence that the pain she experiences contains these elements, the pain is sequelae of a MIG injury.”
  • Despite Wahedi testing in the minimal range for anxiety and depression Dr. Wilderman diagnosis of adjustment disorder was contradictory and no basis was provided for this diagnosis other than reference to Wahedi’s self-reports of feeling distressed.
  • Dr. Wilderman’s findings of functional limitation due to pain were based on Wahedi’s report of reduced working hours and difficulty performing housekeeping tasks and decreased memory and concentration.
  • No evidence was provided from Wahidi’s employer to indicate any workplace restrictions Moreover, the family doctor’s records do not indicate any report of functional limitation until 2 years post accident.
  • Section 38 of the Schedule does not say a s44 assessment must be conducted. The onus being that of Wahedi to lead sufficient compelling evidence of chronic pain with functional impairment or disability, which she has not established as sufficient for a removal from the MIG.


If you Have Read This Far…

Our MIG Monday series discusses the multitude of factors to consider when evaluating a risk position on MIG cases. The Tribunal has ruled on the MIG in 24% of the decisions so far. Each case is nuanced, but with similar factors.

Inform your position & present persuasive arguments. Include an Outcome Analysis Report (OAR) in your case evaluation complete with For/Against cases. Need an OAR?

 

Archive of LAT Updates

June 4, 2025: MIG Escape Justifies CAT Assessments

CAT, MIG

June 2, 2025: Late Onset (Two Years) Shoulder Pain Remains in MIG

MIG

May 28, 2025: CRA Records not Necessarily Determinative Absent Corroborating Documentation

IRB

May 26, 2025: Insomnia a Pre-Existing Condition

MIG

May 16, 2025: First Year of Self Employment Results in $Nil IRB Despite Demonstrated Earnings

IRB

May 12, 2025: Res Judicata Not Waived For New MIG Hearing

MIG

April 30, 2025: Tribunal Confirms Four Class 4 Marked Impairments

CAT

April 28, 2025: MIG Not Conceded Despite Approved CAT Assessments

MIG

April 23, 2025: Court Reverses Tribunal’s Unreasonable Adjournment Refusal

Adjournment, CAT, Divisional Court

April 21, 2025: MIG Escape on Fractured Tooth 15 Months Later

MIG

April 16, 2025: Deficient Notice Renders NEB Payable

NEB

April 14, 2025: MIG Valid Medical Reason

MIG

April 9, 2025: Bus Travelling Over Elevated Manhole Cover Satisfies “Collision”

Definition Accident

April 7, 2025: Four OCF 18’s Payable Despite MIG Hold

MIG

March 26, 2025: Post 104 IRB Ongoing for Non-CAT

CAT, IRB

March 24, 2025: 30% Award for Failure to Review CNRs Overturned on Reconsideration

MIG

March 19, 2025: Yes to CAT, No to Post 104 IRB

CAT, IRB

March 17, 2025: Imaging Report Alone Insufficient to Establish Causation

MIG

March 12, 2025: Tribunal Rules Again on Matter Referred Back by the Court

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

March 10, 2025: Res Judicata Waived on New Evidence

MIG

March 5, 2025: No Criterion 8 CAT as Physical Pain the Limiting Factor

CAT

March 3, 2025: Cause of Shoulder Tear Degenerative or MVA Related?

MIG

February 26, 2025: NEB Payable to 104 Week Mark Due to Technical Breaches

NEB

February 24, 2025: Doctor Not Required to Provide Diagnosis

MIG

February 19, 2025: Court Sets Aside Tribunal S.32 Notice Decision

Breaking News, Div Court, Limitation Period

February 12, 2025: Post 104 IRB Despite Employment & No CAT As Only Two Marked Impairments

CAT, IRB

February 10, 2025: GP Evidence Preferred over IE Regarding Concussion

MIG

February 5, 2025: No Election Required Despite Endorsement of IRB & NEB

Procedure, SABS

January 27, 2025: CNR’s + Imaging Determinative of Complete Shoulder Tear

MIG

January 22, 2025: Court of Appeal Upholds Divisional Court Decision

Divisional Court, NEB, Reconsideration

January 20, 2025: GP’s Diagnosis of “Head Injury” Prevails

MIG

January 15, 2025: Tribunal Accepts Neither Expert in Awarding Pre But Not Post 104 IRB

IRB

January 13, 2025: A Brain Contusion is Not Enough for a Concussion Diagnosis

MIG

January 9, 2025: Court Awards $69K in Costs for Apparent Miscarriage of Justice

Divisional Court,Costs

January 6, 2025: Corroborative Evidence Not Necessarily Required in Psych Diagnoses

MIG

December 18, 2024: Applicant Successful in CAT Case Where Respondent’s Expert Unavailable

CAT

December 16, 2024: Applicants Lose on Flawed Interpretation of the Schedule

MIG

December 11, 2024: Court Sends Paraplegic Matter Back to Tribunal re “Accident”

Definition Accident, Divisional Court, Reconsiderations

December 9, 2024: Pre-Existing Conditions MIG Escapes?

MIG

December 4, 2024: Court Remits $770K Award Worthy Matter Back to Tribunal

Award, Divisional Court, IRB

December 2, 2024: GP Questionnaire Does Not Trigger MIG Escape on Pre Existing

MIG

November 27, 2024: Court Remits $200K Award Worthy Matters Back to Tribunal

Award, Divisional Court, IRB

November 25, 2024: Pre-Screen Not Psychological Diagnosis

MIG

November 20, 2024: IE Not Reasonable or Necessary – No to CAT & IRB

CAT, IRB, Procedure

November 18, 2024: No Evidence Pre-Existing Conditions Prevent MMR

MIG

November 13, 2024: Applicant’s Explanation for Delayed Application Found Reasonable

Procedure

November 11, 2024: GP Concussion Diagnosis Accepted as Legitimate

MIG

November 6, 2024: Court Remits “Unsafe” Decision Back for Rehearing

CAT

November 4, 2024: Submissions Do Not = Evidence

MIG