
MIG Update – December 8, 2025
Did the Accident Really Cause New Psych Injuries?
This week, a MIG escape case in which the Tribunal considered an extensive psychological history and a pre-existing psychiatric diagnosis, and assessed whether the accident caused additional psychological or psychiatric conditions. Importantly, as is often the case, the Tribunal examined the impact of corroborating evidence from the treating doctors. The Tribunal’s analysis explains why less weight was given to the Respondent’s IE.
Virtual Training – *NEW* Upcoming Fall Sessions

Secure your seat for inHEALTH’s 2025 upcoming Virtual Training sessions!
- BI Fundamentals: January 19-23, 2025
*Eligible Participants receive 9 Substantive – CPD hours upon course completion
Course details & register here +
In Robinson v. Co-operators General Insurance Co (23-014282), Ellocent Robinson was involved in an accident on July 12, 2022 and sought entitlement to IRBs in the amount of $213.34 per week from July 19, 2022 to February 15, 2023 as well as three Treatment Plans for physiotherapy services and psychological assessment totaling $6,003.20. She submitted that she should be removed from the MIG, as she suffered from psychological impairment as a result of the accident. This review relates to the MIG analysis.
Robinson acknowledged that she was under the care of a psychiatrist before the accident, due to both personal and work-related stress and was diagnosed with both anxiety and depression. She submitted that after the accident she suffered from flashbacks to the accident, nightmares, motivation issues and hypervigilance while driving. She relied on the CNRs and the report of psychologist Dr. Young dated February 2024, who diagnosed her with accident-related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and features of chronic pain disorder.
Co-operators submitted that Robinson’s psychological symptoms pre-existed the accident and that she failed to prove that the accident resulted in a psychological impairment. It relied on the March 2023 IE report of psychiatrist Dr. Jwely, who diagnosed her with chronic adjustment (mixed type) disorder and cluster B personality traits and opined that her psychiatric complaints arose from past traumatic events, but not from the accident.
Get Your Stats Report!
inHEALTH’s Statistical Reports provide insights and analysis on the outcomes of Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) and court decisions.
Customize success rate reports on any variable relating to disputed AB claims captured in LAT and court decisions!
Decisions By Top 10 Insurers

*Sample Chart
Statistical Report fees are based on the complexity of your data request
Learn More & Get a Quote Here >
The Tribunal found:
- Dr. Young’s opinion was given more weight because it involved extensive clinical interviews and psychometric testing, and specifically compared Robinson’s pre- and post-accident symptoms, confirming the emergence of new disorders like PTSD.
- Dr. Jwely diagnosed Robinson with chronic adjustment disorder (mixed type) and Cluster B personality traits, but concluded these conditions were not accident-related. His opinion was based on a one-hour interview and a review of medical records. He attributed Robinson’s psychiatric symptoms to past trauma and stated that her account of the accident “does not correlate with the current symptoms.” This opinion was given limited weight because it provides no meaningful analysis of the symptoms she links to the accident such as flashbacks, homelessness, and pain-related issues and failed to compare her pre- and post-accident presentation.
- “I further find that the CNRs from Richvale Medical Centre and Dr. Memon support the applicant’s claims. While the pre-accident Richvale CNRs refer to anxiety, depression and possible borderline personality disorder, those from after the accident refer to PTSD related to the accident and pain which worsened her mental health issues. While the pre-accident CNRs of Dr. Memon focused on the applicant’s reports of harassment at work, the post-accident CNRs frequently include discussions of the accident and the applicant’s driving-specific anxiety.”
Need a briefing on recent MIG trends or a case law training session for your team? We can help.
Contact us today or reach out on live chat to set up a tailored session or request a stat report and summary of recent MIG rulings.
inHEALTH Keeps you LAT inFORMED With Access To:
1. LAT Compendium Database – a relational database of LAT and Divisional Court Decisions equipped with multiple search options, Smart Filters, and concise case summaries
2. Notifications: – weekly LAT inFORMER delivered to your inbox Wednesdays; Newly Added Decisions on Fridays and Breaking News as and when it happens
3. Research Support: – inHEALTH’s Live Chat Experts for guided searches and technical inquiries.
Sign up for a 14 day free trial below to experience the service and see how it can help guide your decision making.