Print

 

 Volume. 6 Issue. 43 – November 2, 2022


The Tribunal continues to wrestle with what constitutes a “complete” OCF-3, although in the two cases featured we seem at least to have arrived at somewhat of a consensus. This contrasts with an earlier decision in which the Tribunal reiterated that “a completed” disability certificate can only be reasonably interpreted to mean completed in a manner that certifies that the applicant meets the criterion for NEB”.

In both cases this week, there was an initial OCF-3 that did not support entitlement to a specified benefit, although, submitted within the 104 weeks. with a subsequent “qualifying” OCF-3 being submitted more than 104 weeks post MVA.

‘Late OCF-3 Not Necessarily Fatal to IRB Claim’ considers a motion to dismiss an application as statute barred, wherein an OCF-3 supporting IRB entitlement was not submitted until 129 weeks post MVA.

Conversely, ‘Late OCF-3 Fatal to NEB Claim” in Schedule considers whether a late “qualifying” OCF-3 would preclude in its entirety entitlement to NEB.


Need help finding cases? Reach out to our Live Chat Experts for guided searches!



Able to Proceed Despite Late “Qualifying” OCF-3

Late OCF-3 Not Necessarily Fatal to IRB Claim – In 20-011497 v TD Insurance, TD brought a motion seeking to determine whether the Applicant Ruchlemer was precluded from proceeding with the application for IRB because she did not provide a disability certificate (‘OCF-3’) that supports her claim for IRB within 104-weeks of the subject accident?

Injured in a September 2015 accident, Ruchlemer did not provide a completed OCF-3 supporting IRB until March 13, 2018, being 129 weeks post accident. However, the Tribunal found that Ruchlemer had much earlier provided a completed OCF-3 dated October 6, 2015, although same neither supported entitlement to IRB nor NEB. TD had in fact responded to this OCF-3 October 22, 2015, informing Ruchlemer that she was not entitled to IRB or NEB.

Counsel for TD was queried at the hearing regarding the earlier OCF-3, responding that while a completed OCF-3 was provided within 104 weeks, the matter was nonetheless statute barred as Ruchlemer failed to submit a completed OCF-3 claiming an IRB until approximately 129 weeks after the accident..

The Tribunal though found that s.36 does not make any reference to whether or not the applicant must meet the substantial inability test. The fact of the initial OCF-3 not supporting entitlement to IRB “is something that can be addressed at the substantive issue hearing. Preliminary issues are very technical in nature. The question here is whether or not she submitted the OCF-3 within the 104-week mark. Based on the evidence before, I find that the applicant did comply with the requirements”.



OCF-3 Endorsing NEB Too Late to Qualify

Late OCF-3 Fatal to NEB Claim – Injured in a December 2017 accident, the Applicant Valentine, in 20-008673 v AIG Insurance, sought entitlement to NEB. Specifically at issue was whether Valentine was barred from proceeding with her claim for a NEB under sections 12(3)(c) and 36(3) for failing to submit a completed OCF-3 within 104 weeks of the accident.

An initial OCF-3 submitted August 1, 2019, did not support entitlement to NEB, whereas a subsequent OCF-3 submitted April 22, 2020 did support entitlement, well beyond the required 104 weeks post MVA. AIG submitted that a “completed” OCF-3 requires entitlement to be confirmed, which the Tribunal agreed with Valentine not to be the case.

Ultimately however, the Tribunal found that Valentine had not submitted a “qualifying” OCF-3 until after April 2020, significantly after her period of entitlement to NEB had ended. The initial OCF-3, submitted in August 2019, very near the end of the eligibility period was found to have “potentially and consequently limiting (Valentine) from making a valid, timely claim for a NEB.” Submitting the second OCF-3 well after the initial 104 weeks, resulted in Valentine not being entitled to NEB during the entire eligibility period.



Access inHEALTH’s research resources through Live Chat and receive your OAR. Get It now!

 

Archive of LAT Updates

April 15, 2024: Demands of Child-birth Pre-Existing Condition?

MIG

April 22, 2024: Records Alone Do Not Warrant MIG Removal on Pre-Existing

MIG

April 15, 2024: Demands of Child-birth Pre-Existing Condition?

MIG

April 10, 2024: Court Upholds Tribunal Decision That a MIG Removal is a Complete MIG Removal

Divisional Court, MIG

April 8, 2024: Psychiatric Diagnosis Prevails over Psychological Opinion

MIG

April 3, 2024: Court Sends Matter Back to Tribunal Concerning “Accident”

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

April 1, 2024: Ortho Opinion Prevails on Origins of a Fracture

MIG

March 27, 2024: Supreme Court Takes Issue with Tribunal, Divisional Court & Court of Appeal

Limitation Period, Reconsideration, Supreme Court

March 25, 2024: Expert’s Conclusory Statement Insufficient on Pre-existing Condition

MIG

March 20, 2024: Non-Compliance by Both Parties Impacts IRB and Medical Claims

IRB

March 18, 2024: No Weight Afforded to Handwritten Illegible CNR’s

MIG

March 13, 2024: Denials Deficient and Pain Relief Validates Treatment Plans

Treatment Plans

March 11, 2024: “Radicular Irritation” & MRI Findings Not MVA Related

MIG

March 6, 2024: Tribunal Upholds Decision Excluding Improperly Secured IEs From the Evidence

Evidence, IE, Reconsideration

March 4, 2024: Concussion and Chronic Pain Diagnoses Require Expertise

MIG

February 28, 2024: Prior Health Concerns Complicate Claim for CAT

CAT

February 26, 2024: Unchallenged Virtual Chronic Pain Assessment Accepted

MIG

February 21, 2024: Consent by Parties for Adjournment Not Determinative

Adjournment, Procedure

February 14, 2024: Tribunal Does Not Accept the CAT Findings of Either Party

CAT

February 12, 2024: MIG Escape on Concussion Diagnosis Despite Resolution of Symptoms

MIG

February 7, 2024: Financial Hardship Not A Defense for Repayment Responsibility

IRB

February 5, 2024: CT Scan of Wrist Fracture Contradicts Medical Opinion

MIG

January 29, 2024: Concussion Despite No Head Injury?

MIG

January 24, 2024: One Assessment Process Produces Two Discrete Reports

CAT, Productions

January 22, 2024: Defective Notices Do Not Trigger Limitation

MIG

January 17, 2024: Election Not Required, LAT Act Invoked & Limits Exhausted?

Award, Limitation Period

January 15, 2024: Chronic Pain Diagnosis Contradicted by Self-Reports

MIG

January 10, 2024: NEB Reinstated After Six Years Generates Award

Award, NEB

January 8, 2024: Undisputed Psychological Diagnosis Prevails

MIG

January 3, 2024: Significant & Competing Price of Non-Compliance for Both Parties

Non-Compliance

December 20, 2023 (Throwback Edition): Statutory Relief Within Tribunal’s Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

December 18, 2023: ‘Incident’ of Viewing Video Not Use and Operation

MIG

December 13, 2023 (Throwback Edition): Employed Applicant Remains Entitled to Post 104 IRB

IRB

December 11, 2023: Chronic Pain Diagnosis In Absence of Physical Exam?

MIG

December 6, 2023: Four Marked Impairments for 2010 MVA

CAT

December 4, 2023: No Adverse Inference Drawn Despite Lack of pre MVA CNRs

MIG

November 29, 2023 (THROWBACK EDITION): 18 Month Delayed Notice Reasonable, However 7 Month Delay is Not

Limitation Period

November 27, 2023: Confirmed High Bar to Escape MIG on Pre-Existing

MIG

November 22, 2023: Multiple IEs Excluded From Evidence

IE, Evidence

November 20, 2023: Radiculopathy Complaint Requires a Diagnosis

MIG

November 15, 2023: Court Applies Tomec & CAT Decision Varied

CAT, Limitation Period

November 13, 2023: Insurer Expert Conclusion Inconsistent with Findings

MIG

November 8, 2023: Maximum Award in Excess of $60K on CAT Case

CAT

November 6, 2023: Medical Evidence Overrides Legal Referrals

MIG

November 1, 2023: Eighteen Month Delayed Notice Reasonable However Seven Month Delay is Not

Limitation Period

October 30, 2023: Which MVA Exacerbated Injuries?

MIG

October 25, 2023: Application Seeking CAT Determination an Abuse of Process

CAT

October 23, 2023: Functional Disability Despite 50 Hour Work Week

MIG

October 18, 2023: Statutory Relief Renders Equitable Remedy Moot

Div Court

October 16, 2023: Injuries Not Static - MIG Determined Again

MIG

October 11, 2023: CERB is Income However Not “Gross Employment Income”

IRB

October 4, 2023: Employed Applicant Remains Entitled to Post 104 IRB

IRB

October 2, 2023: ‘IE’ Does Not Establish Causation

MIG

September 27, 2023: Post June 1 CAT Criterion 8 Satisfied

CAT

September 25, 2023: Chronic Pain Distinct from Recurring Pain

MIG

September 20, 2023: Expert Opinion Not Required for IRB Entitlement

IRB

September 18, 2023: Inconsistency Argument Not Accepted

MIG

September 13, 2023: IRB Payment Delayed Four Years – 20% Award

Award, IRB

September 11, 2023: MIG Determined Absent Applicants Written Submissions

MIG

August 30, 2023: Pain Determinative in Successful Post June 1 CAT Case

CAT

August 28, 2023: Knee Injury from MVA Caused Slip and Fall & ACL Tear?

MIG

August 23, 2023: WSIB Placement Qualifies for IRB

IRB

August 21, 2023: Absence of Applicant’s Medicals A Difference Maker

MIG

Contact Sales

416.364.6688

Contact Support

Contact Us

InHealth

11 Allstate Parkway Suite 203
Markham, Ontario
L3R 9T8

Follow Us On