Print

 

  MIG Update – November 28, 2022



Ambivalence Regarding Treatment Does Not Preclude MIG Escape

This week a MIG escape, where the Tribunal concluded that the Applicant abstained from treatment out of reluctance and not because it was unnecessary. Adding commentary that people are reluctant to admit that they suffer from mental illness to others or themselves. ‘People may lack insight into the nature of their illness and the extent to which it affects their lives”.


OARs provide 3 LAT Decisions each for and against for your fact situation, to inFORM your position, compare your evidence and assess your risk.

Buy Now!



Factor: Not Seeking Psych Treatment

In Roldan v. The Personal Insurance Company (20-009383), Nanette Roldan was involved in a motor vehicle accident on May 12, 2018. She claimed that amongst sprains and strains that she also sustained two non minor injuries namely a psychological impairment and chronic pain.

Roldan relied on the records and reports of her family physicians in particular Dr. Dr. Araujo following appointment on May 24th 2018 diagnosed her with “anxiety neurosis disorder” and prescribed Cymbalta.

With respect to the psychological impairment The Personal relied on the IE report of Mr. F. Salerno, a psychologist dated November 8, 2018 that Roldan exhibited mild psychological symptoms of which the breadth and severity fell below the threshold for a psych diagnosis. Further that Roldan must not have sustained a psych impairment never having obtained psychological or psychiatric treatment and that she stopped taking the Cymbalta prescribed by Dr. Araujo after two weeks.





The Tribunal found:

      • The records of her family Dr. Ameens note of May 16th indicated ‘anxious and sleep disturbance. Dr. Arujo’s note May 24, 2019 indicated Roldan reported delayed sleep latency, being afraid to drive and was tearful at the appointment and diagnosed her with ‘anxiety neurosis’ recommending psychological treatment.
      • Roldan’s psychological symptoms were more significant than a brief display of distress not accepting Mr. Salerno opinion that Roldan “exhibited brief affective distress” when describing the accident and her psychological symptoms were mild and didn’t amount to a psychological impairment.
      • The substance of the information she provided to Mr. Salerno shows that her symptoms were clearly still significant. Roldan became tearful when she recounted the accident and said that she may cry if she described it in “vivid detail.” She said that she felt fear and anxiety when driving; and as a passenger her hands may perspire, and she will sometimes press a phantom brake, check the car’s blind spot, and caution the driver; she has never returned to the site of the accident; and she continued to have difficulty falling asleep.
      • Roldan’s ambivalence about seeking treatment was noted throughout the medical records and as early as her visit to Dr. Araujo in May 2018 when she indicated that she would ‘consider’ seeking a psychological assessment.
      • If Mr. Salerno had seen the family doctors’ CNRs that he might have better appreciated the state of Roland’s mental health, in particular Dr. Araujo’s note of May 24, 2018.


If you Have Read This Far…

Our MIG Monday series discusses the multitude of factors to consider when evaluating a risk position on MIG cases. The Tribunal has ruled on the MIG in 24% of the decisions so far. Each case is nuanced, but with similar factors.

Inform your position & present persuasive arguments. Include an Outcome Analysis Report (OAR) in your case evaluation complete with For/Against cases. Need an OAR?

 

Archive of LAT Updates

March 27, 2024: Supreme Court Takes Issue with Tribunal, Divisional Court & Court of Appeal

Limitation Period, Reconsideration, Supreme Court

March 25, 2024: Expert’s Conclusory Statement Insufficient on Pre-existing Condition

MIG

March 20, 2024: Non-Compliance by Both Parties Impacts IRB and Medical Claims

IRB

March 18, 2024: No Weight Afforded to Handwritten Illegible CNR’s

MIG

March 13, 2024: Denials Deficient and Pain Relief Validates Treatment Plans

Treatment Plans

March 11, 2024: “Radicular Irritation” & MRI Findings Not MVA Related

MIG

March 6, 2024: Tribunal Upholds Decision Excluding Improperly Secured IEs From the Evidence

Evidence, IE, Reconsideration

March 4, 2024: Concussion and Chronic Pain Diagnoses Require Expertise

MIG

February 28, 2024: Prior Health Concerns Complicate Claim for CAT

CAT

February 26, 2024: Unchallenged Virtual Chronic Pain Assessment Accepted

MIG

February 21, 2024: Consent by Parties for Adjournment Not Determinative

Adjournment, Procedure

February 14, 2024: Tribunal Does Not Accept the CAT Findings of Either Party

CAT

February 12, 2024: MIG Escape on Concussion Diagnosis Despite Resolution of Symptoms

MIG

February 7, 2024: Financial Hardship Not A Defense for Repayment Responsibility

IRB

February 5, 2024: CT Scan of Wrist Fracture Contradicts Medical Opinion

MIG

January 29, 2024: Concussion Despite No Head Injury?

MIG

January 24, 2024: One Assessment Process Produces Two Discrete Reports

CAT, Productions

January 22, 2024: Defective Notices Do Not Trigger Limitation

MIG

January 17, 2024: Election Not Required, LAT Act Invoked & Limits Exhausted?

Award, Limitation Period

January 15, 2024: Chronic Pain Diagnosis Contradicted by Self-Reports

MIG

January 10, 2024: NEB Reinstated After Six Years Generates Award

Award, NEB

January 8, 2024: Undisputed Psychological Diagnosis Prevails

MIG

January 3, 2024: Significant & Competing Price of Non-Compliance for Both Parties

Non-Compliance

December 20, 2023 (Throwback Edition): Statutory Relief Within Tribunal’s Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

December 18, 2023: ‘Incident’ of Viewing Video Not Use and Operation

MIG

December 13, 2023 (Throwback Edition): Employed Applicant Remains Entitled to Post 104 IRB

IRB

December 11, 2023: Chronic Pain Diagnosis In Absence of Physical Exam?

MIG

December 6, 2023: Four Marked Impairments for 2010 MVA

CAT

December 4, 2023: No Adverse Inference Drawn Despite Lack of pre MVA CNRs

MIG

November 29, 2023 (THROWBACK EDITION): 18 Month Delayed Notice Reasonable, However 7 Month Delay is Not

Limitation Period

November 27, 2023: Confirmed High Bar to Escape MIG on Pre-Existing

MIG

November 22, 2023: Multiple IEs Excluded From Evidence

IE, Evidence

November 20, 2023: Radiculopathy Complaint Requires a Diagnosis

MIG

November 15, 2023: Court Applies Tomec & CAT Decision Varied

CAT, Limitation Period

November 13, 2023: Insurer Expert Conclusion Inconsistent with Findings

MIG

November 8, 2023: Maximum Award in Excess of $60K on CAT Case

CAT

November 6, 2023: Medical Evidence Overrides Legal Referrals

MIG

November 1, 2023: Eighteen Month Delayed Notice Reasonable However Seven Month Delay is Not

Limitation Period

October 30, 2023: Which MVA Exacerbated Injuries?

MIG

October 25, 2023: Application Seeking CAT Determination an Abuse of Process

CAT

October 23, 2023: Functional Disability Despite 50 Hour Work Week

MIG

October 18, 2023: Statutory Relief Renders Equitable Remedy Moot

Div Court

October 16, 2023: Injuries Not Static - MIG Determined Again

MIG

October 11, 2023: CERB is Income However Not “Gross Employment Income”

IRB

October 4, 2023: Employed Applicant Remains Entitled to Post 104 IRB

IRB

October 2, 2023: ‘IE’ Does Not Establish Causation

MIG

September 27, 2023: Post June 1 CAT Criterion 8 Satisfied

CAT

September 25, 2023: Chronic Pain Distinct from Recurring Pain

MIG

September 20, 2023: Expert Opinion Not Required for IRB Entitlement

IRB

September 18, 2023: Inconsistency Argument Not Accepted

MIG

September 13, 2023: IRB Payment Delayed Four Years – 20% Award

Award, IRB

September 11, 2023: MIG Determined Absent Applicants Written Submissions

MIG

August 30, 2023: Pain Determinative in Successful Post June 1 CAT Case

CAT

August 28, 2023: Knee Injury from MVA Caused Slip and Fall & ACL Tear?

MIG

August 23, 2023: WSIB Placement Qualifies for IRB

IRB

August 21, 2023: Absence of Applicant’s Medicals A Difference Maker

MIG

Contact Sales

416.364.6688

Contact Support

Contact Us

InHealth

11 Allstate Parkway Suite 203
Markham, Ontario
L3R 9T8

Follow Us On